COLD SNARE POLYPECTOMY: A SAFE PROCEDURE FOR REMOVING SMALL NON-PEDUNCULATED COLORECTAL LESIONS.

BACKGROUND: Polypectomy is an important treatment option for preventing colorectal cancer. Incomplete polyp resection (IPR) is re-cognized as a risk factor for interval cancer. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to evaluate the complete polyp resection (CPR) rate for cold snare polypectomy (CSP) in small non-pedunculated polyps and, secondarily, specimen retrieval and complication rates. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 479 polyps <10 mm removed by CSP in 276 patients by an inexperienced endoscopist. RESULTS: A total of 476 polyps (99.4%) were resected en bloc. A negative margin (classified as CPR) was observed in 435 polyps (90.8%). An unclear or positive margin (classified as IPR) was observed in 43 cases (9.0%) and 1 case (0.2%), respectively, for an overall IPR rate of 9.2% (44/479). The IPR rate was 12.2% in the first half of cases and 5.9% in the second half (P=0.02). Dividing into tertiles, the IPR rate was 15.0% in the first tertile, 6.9% in the second tertile, and 5.7% in the third tertile (P=0.01). Dividing into quartiles, the IPR rate was 15.8% in the first quartile and 5.9% in the fourth quartile (P=0.03). The IPR rate was 6.3% for type 0-IIa lesions and 14.1% for type 0-Is lesions (P=0.01). For serrated and adenomatous lesions, the IPR rate was 9.2%. Specimen retrieval failed in 3.6% of cases. Immediate bleeding (>30 s) occurred in 1 case (0.2%), treated with argon plasma coagulation. No delayed bleeding or perforation occurred. CONCLUSION: CSP is a safe technique that provides good results for the resection of small non-pedunculated polyps, with a short learning curve.

Polipectomia a frio: um procedimento seguro para remover pequenas lesões colorretais não pediculadas / Cold snare polypectomy: a safe procedure for removing small non-pedunculated colorectal lesions

ABSTRACT Background: Polypectomy is an important treatment option for preventing colorectal cancer. Incomplete polyp resection (IPR) is re­cognized as a risk factor for interval cancer. Objective: The primary objective was to evaluate the complete polyp resection (CPR) rate for cold snare polypectomy (CSP) in small non-pedunculated polyps and, secondarily, specimen retrieval and complication rates. Methods: We prospectively evaluated 479 polyps <10 mm removed by CSP in 276 patients by an inexperienced endoscopist. Results: A total of 476 polyps (99.4%) were resected en bloc. A negative margin (classified as CPR) was observed in 435 polyps (90.8%). An unclear or positive margin (classified as IPR) was observed in 43 cases (9.0%) and 1 case (0.2%), respectively, for an overall IPR rate of 9.2% (44/479). The IPR rate was 12.2% in the first half of cases and 5.9% in the second half (P=0.02). Dividing into tertiles, the IPR rate was 15.0% in the first tertile, 6.9% in the second tertile, and 5.7% in the third tertile (P=0.01). Dividing into quartiles, the IPR rate was 15.8% in the first quartile and 5.9% in the fourth quartile (P=0.03). The IPR rate was 6.3% for type 0-IIa lesions and 14.1% for type 0-Is lesions (P=0.01). For serrated and adenomatous lesions, the IPR rate was 9.2%. Specimen retrieval failed in 3.6% of cases. Immediate bleeding (>30 s) occurred in 1 case (0.2%), treated with argon plasma coagulation. No delayed bleeding or perforation occurred. Conclusion: CSP is a safe technique that provides good results for the resection of small non-pedunculated polyps, with a short learning curve.

RESUMO Contexto: A polipectomia é uma importante opção terapêutica na prevenção do câncer colorretal (CCR). A ressecção incompleta do pólipo (RIP) é reconhecida como fator de risco para o câncer de intervalo. Objetivo: O principal objetivo foi avaliar o índice de ressecção completa da polipectomia a frio (PF) em pequenos pólipos não pediculados e, secundariamente, a recuperação do espécime e índice de complicações. Métodos: Avaliamos prospectivamente 479 pólipos <10 mm removidos por PF em 276 pacientes, por um endoscopista sem experiência com este método. Resultados: Foram ressecados em bloco 476 pólipos (99,4%). Tivemos margem negativa, considerada ressecção completa do pólipo (RCP), em 435 (90,8%) casos. Margem indefinida ou positiva (classificada como RIP) foi observada em 43 (9,0%) casos e em 1 (0,2%) caso, respectivamente, com um índice global de RIP de 9,2% (44/479). O índice de RIP foi de 12,5% na primeira metade dos casos e 5,9% na última metade (P=0,02). Dividindo em tercis, o índice de RIP foi de 15,0% no primeiro terço, 6,9% no segundo terço e 5,7% no terceiro quarto, P=0,01. Dividindo em quartis, o índice de RIP foi de 15,8% no primeiro quarto, enquanto o último quarto foi de 5,9%, P=0,03. O índice de RIP foi de 6,3% para lesões tipo 0-IIa e de 14,1% para lesões tipo 0-Is, P=0,01. O índice de RIP foi de 9,2% para lesões serrilhadas e adenomatosas. Houve falha na recuperação dos espécimes em 3,6% dos casos. Sangramento imediato (>30 s) ocorreu em um caso (0,2%), controlado com plasma de argônio. Sem sangramento tardio e perfuração. Conclusão: PF é uma técnica segura que apresenta bons resultados para a ressecção de pequenas lesões não pediculadas, com uma curta curva aprendizado.

CAN BLUE LASER IMAGING COLLABORATE IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS BETWEEN NEOPLASTIC AND NON-NEOPLASTIC COLORECTAL LESIONS? / PODE O BLUE LASER IMAGING COLABORAR NO DIAGNÓSTICO DIFERENCIAL ENTRE LESÕES NEOPLÁSICAS E NÃO NEOPLÁSICAS COLORRETAIS?

Introduction: Improved endoscopic imaging allows the differential diagnosis of colorectal lesions in real time through the study of the microvasculature. Objective: To review the use of Blue Laser Imaging (BLI) in analyzing the capillary patern for the differential diagnosis between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions. Method: This is an integrative review of the literature that collected information published on virtual platforms in Portuguese and English. The search for reading and analysis was carried out on the SciELO ­ Scientific Electronic Library Online, Google Scholar, Pubmed and Scopus platforms. The descriptors taken from DeCS/MESH were: "Blue laser imaging. Endoscopy. Chromoendoscopy, Colorectal polyps. Magnification" and its English counterparts "Blue laser imaging. Image-enhanced endoscopy. Chromoendoscopy. Colorectal polyps. Magnification" with AND or OR search, considering the title and/or abstract. Only those that had the greatest correlation to the topic were included, and the review was based on them, with reading, in full, of the texts. Results: In the end, 22 articles resulted that made up this review. Conclusion: BLI associated with magnification showed good results in real-time predictive histological diagnosis for colon and rectal lesions.

Introdução: Imagem endoscópica aprimorada permite o diagnóstico diferencial das lesões colorretais em tempo real através do estudo da microvasculatura. Objetivo: Revisar o uso do Blue Laser Imaging (BLI) na análise do padrão dos capilares para o diagnóstico diferencial entre lesões neoplásicas e não neoplásicas. Método: Esta é revisão integrativa da literatura  que colheu informações publicadas em plataformas virtuais em português e inglês. A busca para leitura e análise foi realizada nas plataformas SciELO ­ Scientific Electronic Library Online, Google Scholar, Pubmed e Scopus.  Os descritores retirados do DeCS/MESH foram: "Blue laser imaging. Endoscopia. Cromoendoscopia, Pólipos colorretais. Magnificação" e seus correspondentes em inglês "Blue laser imaging. Image-enhanced endoscopy. Chromoendoscopy. Colorectal polyps. Magnification" com busca AND ou OR, considerando o título e/ou resumo. Foram incluídos somente os que tivessem maior correlação ao tema, e neles foi baseada a revisão com leitura, na íntegra, dos textos. Resultados: Ao final resultaram  22 artigos que compuseram esta revisão. Conclusão: BLI associada à magnificação mostrou bons resultados no diagnóstico histológico preditivo em tempo real para as lesões de cólon e reto.

Pode o Blue Laser Imaging colaborar no diagnóstico diferencial entre lesões neoplásicas e não neoplásicas colorretais? / Can Blue Laser Imaging collaborate in the differential diagnosis between neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal lesions?

Introdução: Imagem endoscópica aprimorada permite o diagnóstico diferencial das lesões colorretais em tempo real através do estudo da microvasculatura. Objetivo: Revisar o uso do Blue Laser Imaging (BLI) na análise do padrão dos capilares para o diagnóstico diferencial entre lesões neoplásicas e não neoplásicas. Métodos: Esta é revisão integrativa da literatura que colheu informações publicadas em plataformas virtuais em português e inglês. A busca para leitura e análise foi realizada nas plataformas SciELO ­ Scientific Electronic Library Online, Google Scholar, Pubmed e Scopus. Os descritores retirados do DeCS/MESH foram: "Blue laser imaging. Endoscopia. Cromoendoscopia, Pólipos colorretais. Magnificação" e seus correspondentes em inglês "Blue laser imaging. Image-enhanced endoscopy. Chromoendoscopy. Colorectal polyps. Magnification" com busca AND ou OR, considerando o título e/ou resumo. Foram incluídos somente os que tivessem maior correlação ao tema, e neles foi baseada a revisão com leitura, na íntegra, dos textos. Resultados: Ao final resultaram 22 artigos que compuseram esta revisão. Conclusão: BLI associada à magnificação mostrou bons resultados no diagnóstico histológico preditivo em tempo real para as lesões de cólon e reto.

Introduction: Improved endoscopic imaging allows the differential diagnosis of colorectal lesions in real time through the study of the microvasculature. Objective: To review the use of Blue Laser Imaging (BLI) in analyzing the capillary patern for the differential diagnosis between neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions. Methods: This is an integrative review of the literature that collected information published on virtual platforms in Portuguese and English. The search for reading and analysis was carried out on the SciELO ­ Scientific Electronic Library Online, Google Scholar, Pubmed and Scopus platforms. The descriptors taken from DeCS/MESH were: "Blue laser imaging. Endoscopy. Chromoendoscopy, Colorectal polyps. Magnification" and its English counterparts "Blue laser imaging. Image-enhanced endoscopy. Chromoendoscopy. Colorectal polyps. Magnification" with AND or OR search, considering the title and/or abstract. Only those that had the greatest correlation to the topic were included, and the review was based on them, with reading, in full, of the texts. Results: In the end, 22 articles resulted that made up this review. Conclusion: BLI associated with magnification showed good results in real-time predictive histological diagnosis for colon and rectal lesions.

SMALL AS WELL AS LARGE COLORECTAL LESIONS ARE EFFECTIVELY MANAGED BY ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION TECHNIQUE.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an easy-to-use treatment option for superficial colorectal lesions, including lesions ≥20 mm. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of EMR. METHODS: We evaluated 430 lesions removed by EMR in 404 patients. The lesions were analyzed according to their morphology, size, location, and histology. Lesions <20 mm were resected en bloc, whereas lesions ≥20 mm were removed by piecemeal EMR (p-EMR). Adverse events and recurrence were assessed. RESULTS: Regarding morphology, 145 (33.7%) were depressed lesions, 157 (36.5%) were polypoid lesions and 128 (29.8%) were laterally spreading lesions, with 361 (84%) lesions <20 mm and 69 (16%) ≥20 mm. Regarding histology, 413 (96%) lesions were classified as neoplastic lesions. Overall, 14 (3.3%) adverse reactions occurred, most commonly in lesions removed by p-EMR (P<0.001) and associated with advanced histology (P=0.008). Recurrence occurred in 14 (5.2%) cases, more commonly in lesions removed by p-EMR (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: EMR is an effective technique for the treatment of superficial colorectal lesions, even of large lesions.

Grandes e pequenas lesões colorretais são efetivamente tratadas pela técnica de mucosectomia / Small as well as large colorectal lesions are effectively managed by endoscopic mucosal resection technique

ABSTRACT Background Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an easy-to-use treatment option for superficial colorectal lesions, including lesions ≥20 mm. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of EMR. Methods We evaluated 430 lesions removed by EMR in 404 patients. The lesions were analyzed according to their morphology, size, location, and histology. Lesions <20 mm were resected en bloc, whereas lesions ≥20 mm were removed by piecemeal EMR (p-EMR). Adverse events and recurrence were assessed. Results Regarding morphology, 145 (33.7%) were depressed lesions, 157 (36.5%) were polypoid lesions and 128 (29.8%) were laterally spreading lesions, with 361 (84%) lesions <20 mm and 69 (16%) ≥20 mm. Regarding histology, 413 (96%) lesions were classified as neoplastic lesions. Overall, 14 (3.3%) adverse reactions occurred, most commonly in lesions removed by p-EMR (P<0.001) and associated with advanced histology (P=0.008). Recurrence occurred in 14 (5.2%) cases, more commonly in lesions removed by p-EMR (P<0.001). Conclusion EMR is an effective technique for the treatment of superficial colorectal lesions, even of large lesions.

RESUMO Contexto Ressecção endoscópica da mucosa (REM) é uma opção fácil para o tratamento das lesões superficiais do cólon e reto, inclusive para as lesões ≥20 mm de diâmetro. Objetivo Avaliar a efetividade da REM. Métodos Este estudo prospectivo observacional avaliou 430 lesões ressecadas por REM em 404 pacientes. As lesões foram analisadas de acordo com a morfologia, tamanho, localização e histologia. Lesões <20 mm foram removidas em bloco, enquanto lesões ≥20 mm foram ressecadas em piecemeal REM (p-REM). Eventos adversos e recorrência foram avaliados. Resultados Quanto à morfologia, 145 (33,7%) eram lesões deprimidas, 157 (36,5%) eram lesões polipoides e 128 (29,8%) eram lesões que se espalham lateralmente, com 361 (84%) lesões <20 mm e 69 (16%) ≥20 mm. Em relação à histologia, 413 (96%) foram classificadas como lesões neoplásicas. Globalmente tivemos 14 (3,3%) de reações adversas, mais presente nas lesões ≥20 mm removidas por p-REM (P<0,001) e associadas com histologia avançada (P=0,008). A recorrência ocorreu em 14 (5,2%) casos, sendo mais observada em lesões removidas por p-REM (P<0,001). Conclusão REM é uma técnica efetiva para o tratamento das lesões colorretais superficiais, até mesmo para as grandes lesões.

Malignancy in large colorectal lesions.

CONTEXT: The size of colorectal lesions, besides a risk factor for malignancy, is a predictor for deeper invasion objectives: To evaluate the malignancy of colorectal lesions ≥20 mm. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2011, 76 neoplasms ≥20 mm in 70 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 67.4 years, and 41 were women. Mean lesion size was 24.7 mm ± 6.2 mm (range: 20 to 50 mm). Half of the neoplasms were polypoid and the other half were non-polypoid. Forty-two (55.3%) lesions were located in the left colon, and 34 in the right colon. There was a high prevalence of III L (39.5%) and IV (53.9%) pit patterns. There were 72 adenomas and 4 adenocarcinomas. Malignancy was observed in 5.3% of the lesions. Thirty-three lesions presented advanced histology (adenomas with high-grade dysplasia or early adenocarcinoma), with no difference in morphology and site. Only one lesion (1.3%) invaded the submucosa. Lesions larger than 30 mm had advanced histology (P = 0.001). The primary treatment was endoscopic resection, and invasive carcinoma was referred to surgery. Recurrence rate was 10.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Large colorectal neoplasms showed a low rate of malignancy. Endoscopic treatment is an effective therapy for these lesions.

Malignancy in arrge colorectal lesinss / Malignidade em grandes lesões colorretais

Context The size of colorectal lesions, besides a risk factor for malignancy, is a predictor for deeper invasion Objectives To evaluate the malignancy of colorectal lesions ≥20 mm. Methods Between 2007 and 2011, 76 neoplasms ≥20 mm in 70 patients were analyzed Results The mean age of the patients was 67.4 years, and 41 were women. Mean lesion size was 24.7 mm ± 6.2 mm (range: 20 to 50 mm). Half of the neoplasms were polypoid and the other half were non-polypoid. Forty-two (55.3%) lesions were located in the left colon, and 34 in the right colon. There was a high prevalence of III L (39.5%) and IV (53.9%) pit patterns. There were 72 adenomas and 4 adenocarcinomas. Malignancy was observed in 5.3% of the lesions. Thirty-three lesions presented advanced histology (adenomas with high-grade dysplasia or early adenocarcinoma), with no difference in morphology and site. Only one lesion (1.3%) invaded the submucosa. Lesions larger than 30 mm had advanced histology (P = 0.001). The primary treatment was endoscopic resection, and invasive carcinoma was referred to surgery. Recurrence rate was 10.6%. Conclusions Large colorectal neoplasms showed a low rate of malignancy. Endoscopic treatment is an effective therapy for these lesions. .

Contexto O tamanho em lesões colorretais, além de risco para malignidade, é preditor para invasão profunda. Objetivos Avaliar a presença de malignidade em lesões colorretais ≥20 mm. Métodos Entre 2007 e 2011, 76 neoplasias colônicas ≥20 mm em 70 pacientes foram analisadas. Resultados A idade média foi de 67,4 anos, e 41 eram mulheres. O tamanho médio das lesões foi de 24,7 mm ± 6,2 mm, com variação de 20 a 50 mm. Metade das neoplasias foram polipoides e a outra metade, não polipoide. O cólon esquerdo apresentou 42 (55,3%) neoplasias e o direito, 34. Houve alta prevalência de lesões com criptas padrão III L (39,5%) e IV (53,9%). Houve 72 adenomas e 4 adenocarcinomas. Malignidade foi detectada em 5,3% dos casos. Histologia avançada (adenoma com displasia de alto grau ou adenocarcinoma precoce) foi diagnosticada em 33 lesões, sem diferença quanto à morfologia e local da lesão. Apenas uma lesão (1,3%) invadiu a submucosa. Lesões maiores de 30 mm apresentaram histologia avançada (P = 0,001). A ressecção endoscópica foi a terapêutica primária, e carcinoma invasivo foi encaminhado para cirurgia. Recorrência foi de 10,6%. Conclusões Grandes neoplasias colorretais demonstram uma baixa taxa de malignidade. A ressecção endoscópica é terapêutica adequada para estas lesões. .

Endoscopic mucosal resection in colorectal lesion: a safe and effective procedure even in lesions larger than 2 cm and in carcinomas.

CONTEXT: Endoscopic mucosal resection is a minimally invasive technique used in the treatment of colorectal neoplasms, including early carcinomas of different size and morphology. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate procedure safety, efficacy, outcomes, and recurrence rate in endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal lesions. METHODS: A total of 172 lesions in 156 patients were analyzed between May 2003 and May 2009. All lesions showed pit pattern suggestive of neoplasia (Kudo types III-V) at high-magnification chromocolonoscopy with indigo carmine. The lesions were evaluated for macroscopic classification, size, location, and histopathology. Lesions 20 mm or smaller were resected en bloc and lesions larger than 20 mm were removed using the piecemeal technique. Complications and recurrence were analyzed. Patients were followed up for 18 months. RESULTS: There were 83 (48.2%) superficial lesions, 57 (33.1%) depressed lesions, 44 (25.6%) laterally spreading tumors, and 45 (26.2%) protruding lesions. Mean lesion size was 11.5 mm ± 9.6 mm (2 mm-60 mm). Patients' mean age was 61.6 ± 12.5 years (34-93 years). Regarding lesion site, 24 (14.0%) lesions were located in the rectum, 68 (39.5%) in the left colon, and 80 (46.5%) in the right colon (transverse, ascending, and cecum). There were 167 (97.1%) neoplasms: 142 (82.5%) adenomatous lesions, 24 (14.0%) intramucosal carcinomas, and 1 (0.6%) invasive carcinoma. En bloc resection was performed in 158 (91.9%) cases and piecemeal resection in 14 (8.1%). Bleeding occurred in 5 (2.9%) cases. Recurrence was observed in 4.1% (5/122) of cases and was associated with lesions larger than 20 mm (P<0.01), piecemeal resection (P<0.01), advanced neoplasm (P = 0.01), and carcinoma compared to adenoma (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal lesions is a safe and effective procedure, with low complication and local recurrence rates. Recurrence is associated with lesions larger than 20 mm and carcinomas.

Endoscopic mucosal resection in colorectal lesion: a safe and effective procedure even in lesions larger than 2 cm and in carcinomas / Mucosectomia em lesões do cólon e reto: procedimento seguro e eficaz mesmo em pacientes com lesões maiores que 2 cm e em carcinomas

CONTEXT: Endoscopic mucosal resection is a minimally invasive technique used in the treatment of colorectal neoplasms, including early carcinomas of different size and morphology. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate procedure safety, efficacy, outcomes, and recurrence rate in endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal lesions. METHODS: A total of 172 lesions in 156 patients were analyzed between May 2003 and May 2009. All lesions showed pit pattern suggestive of neoplasia (Kudo types III-V) at high-magnification chromocolonoscopy with indigo carmine. The lesions were evaluated for macroscopic classification, size, location, and histopathology. Lesions 20 mm or smaller were resected en bloc and lesions larger than 20 mm were removed using the piecemeal technique. Complications and recurrence were analyzed. Patients were followed up for 18 months. RESULTS: There were 83 (48.2 percent) superficial lesions, 57 (33.1 percent) depressed lesions, 44 (25.6 percent) laterally spreading tumors, and 45 (26.2 percent) protruding lesions. Mean lesion size was 11.5 mm ± 9.6 mm (2 mm-60 mm). Patients' mean age was 61.6 ± 12.5 years (34-93 years). Regarding lesion site, 24 (14.0 percent) lesions were located in the rectum, 68 (39.5 percent) in the left colon, and 80 (46.5 percent) in the right colon (transverse, ascending, and cecum). There were 167 (97.1 percent) neoplasms: 142 (82.5 percent) adenomatous lesions, 24 (14.0 percent) intramucosal carcinomas, and 1 (0.6 percent) invasive carcinoma. En bloc resection was performed in 158 (91.9 percent) cases and piecemeal resection in 14 (8.1 percent). Bleeding occurred in 5 (2.9 percent) cases. Recurrence was observed in 4.1 percent (5/122) of cases and was associated with lesions larger than 20 mm (P<0.01), piecemeal resection (P<0.01), advanced neoplasm (P = 0.01), and carcinoma compared to adenoma (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal lesions is a safe and effective procedure, with low complication and local recurrence rates. Recurrence is associated with lesions larger than 20 mm and carcinomas.

CONTEXTO: A mucosectomia endoscópica é uma técnica minimamente invasiva para o tratamento de neoplasias de cólon e reto, inclusive carcinomas precoces, de diferentes tamanhos e aspectos morfológicos. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a segurança, a eficácia, os resultados e a recurrência das lesões após mucosectomia. MÉTODOS: Entre maio de 2003 e maio de 2009 um total de 172 lesões em 156 pacientes foi incluído no estudo. Todas as lesões tinham padrão de criptas sugestivo de neoplasias (III-V), segundo a classificação de Kudo, com o diagnóstico feito por colonoscópios com magnificação de imagens e índigo-carmin. As lesões foram avaliadas quanto à macroscopia, tamanho, localização e histopatologia. Lesões com até 20 mm foram removidas em bloco e as maiores que 20 mm pela técnica de piecemeal. Complicações e recurrência foram analisadas. O seguimento foi de 18 meses. RESULTADOS: Este estudo identificou 83 (48,2 por cento) lesões superficiais, sendo 57 (33,1 por cento) deprimidas, além de 44 (25,6 por cento) lesões de espraiamento lateral e 45 (26,2 por cento) protrusas. O tamanho médio foi de 11,5 ± 9,6 mm (2-60 mm) e a idade média de 61,6 ± 12,5 anos (34-93 anos). No reto estavam 24 (14 por cento) lesões, 68 (39,5 por cento) no cólon esquerdo e 80 (46,5 por cento) no cólon direito (transverso, ascendente e ceco). Foram 167 (97,1 por cento) neoplasias, sendo 142 (82,5 por cento) lesões adenomatosas, 24 (14,0 por cento) carcinomas intramucosos e 1 (0,6 por cento) carcinoma invasivo. Foram tratadas em bloco 158 (91,9 por cento) lesões e 14 (8,1 por cento), por piecemeal. Houve cinco casos (2,9 por cento) de sangramento. A recurrência foi de 4,1 por cento (5/122) e associada a lesões maiores que 20 mm (P<0,01), à técnica piecemeal (P<0,01), à neoplasia avançada (P = 0,01) e ao carcinoma quando comparado ao adenoma (P = 0,04). CONCLUSÕES: A mucosectomia endoscópica de lesões colorretais é procedimento seguro, eficaz, com baixo índice de complicações e recidiva local. A recidiva de lesão é associada a lesões maiores que 20 mm e aos carcinomas.

[Comparative study between MBI (FICE) and magnification chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine in the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions of the colorectum]. / Estudo comparativo entre MBI (FICE) e a magnificação com índigo-carmin no diagnóstico diferencial de lesões neoplásicas e não-neoplásicas de cólon e reto.

CONTEXT: Multiband imaging (MBI)/Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement (FICE) is a spectral image processing technology that helps in vivo diagnosis of colorectal neoplasias. OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the magnification with either the electronic chromoendoscopy or indigo carmine dye in the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal lesions. METHODS: Seventy five patients with 157 colorectal lesions were prospectively evaluated. The capillary pattern, as well as the pit pattern according to the Kudo classification, of colorectal lesions were evaluated by means of the FICE system. Absence and presence of meshed capillary networks were labeled as non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions, respectively. Afterwards, indigo carmine 0.8% was instilled and a new evaluation of the pit pattern was carried out. RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen of the 157 lesions were classified as positive meshed capillary network, 115 of them were confirmed histologically as neoplasia. Other 32 lesions out of 41 with negative meshed capillary network were non-neoplastic. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were, respectively, 92.7%, 97% and 93.6%. Pit patterns I and II were confirmed as non-neoplastic lesions, and patterns III to V were confirmed as neoplasias. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the electronic chromoendoscopy were, respectively, 94.4%, 97% and 94.9%. Meanwhile, the figures for the magnification with indigo carmine were, respectively, 97.6%, 93.9% and 96.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods, either the MBI/FICE system or the use of indigo carmine dye with magnification, achieved a high accuracy for the differential diagnosis between neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal lesions.

Estudo comparativo entre MBI (FICE®) e a magnificação com índigo-carmin no diagnóstico diferencial de lesões neoplásicas e não-neoplásicas de cólon e reto / Comparative study between MBI (FICE®) and magnification chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine in the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions of the colorectum

CONTEXTO: O uso da cromoscopia virtual com sistema de imagem multibanda poderia auxiliar no diagnóstico in vivo de neoplasias colônicas. Objetivo - Avaliar a exatidão da magnificação associada à cromoendoscopia eletrônica ou com índigo-carmin na distinção entre lesões neoplásicas e não-neoplásicas do cólon e reto. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliadas prospectivamente 157 lesões colorretais em 75 pacientes. Empregou-se o sistema FICE® para a análise dos padrões de capilares, com a malha capilar negativa sendo considerada padrão de lesões não-neoplásicas, e a malha capilar positiva, o padrão das neoplasias. Após esta avaliação, ainda usando o sistema FICE®, o padrão de criptas foi definido conforme a classificação de Kudo. Por fim, instilou-se índigo-carmin à 0,8 por cento e outro estudo das criptas foi realizado. RESULTADOS: Entre as 157 lesões colorretais, classificou-se 116 como malha capilar positiva, sendo 115 confirmadas histologicamente como neoplasias. Já entre as 41 lesões com malha capilar negativa, 32 eram não-neoplásicas. A sensibilidade foi de 92,7 por cento, a especificidade de 97 por cento e a precisão de 93,6 por cento. Os padrões de criptas tipo I e II representaram as lesões não-neoplásicas e os tipos III-V, as neoplásicas. Com a utilização da cromoscopia eletrônica, observou-se sensibilidade de 94,4 por cento, especificidade de 97 por cento e precisão de 94,9 por cento. Já com o uso da magnificação associada ao índigo-carmin, a sensibilidade foi de 97,6 por cento, a especificidade de 93,9 por cento e a precisão de 96,8 por cento. CONCLUSÕES: Tanto a cromoendoscopia eletrônica, quanto o uso do índigo-carmin, associados à magnificação de imagens, apresentaram precisão elevada quanto ao diagnóstico histopatológico e não houve diferença estatística entre ambos os métodos.

CONTEXT: Multiband imaging (MBI)/Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement (FICE®) is a spectral image processing technology that helps in vivo diagnosis of colorectal neoplasias. OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the magnification with either the electronic chromoendoscopy or indigo carmine dye in the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal lesions. Methods - Seventy five patients with 157 colorectal lesions were prospectively evaluated. The capillary pattern, as well as the pit pattern according to the Kudo classification, of colorectal lesions were evaluated by means of the FICE® system. Absence and presence of meshed capillary networks were labeled as non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions, respectively. Afterwards, indigo carmine 0.8 percent was instilled and a new evaluation of the pit pattern was carried out. RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen of the 157 lesions were classified as positive meshed capillary network, 115 of them were confirmed histologically as neoplasia. Other 32 lesions out of 41 with negative meshed capillary network were non-neoplastic. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were, respectively, 92.7 percent, 97 percent and 93.6 percent. Pit patterns I and II were confirmed as non-neoplastic lesions, and patterns III to V were confirmed as neoplasies. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the electronic chromoendoscopy were, respectively, 94.4 percent, 97 percent and 94.9 percent. Meanwhile, the figures for the magnification with indigo carmine were, respectively, 97.6 percent, 93.9 percent and 96.8 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods, either the MBI/FICE® system or the use of indigo carmine dye with magnification, achieved a high accuracy for the differential diagnosis between neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal lesions.